Classification: Documented

The Suzano school massacre: eight lives, one school, and questions that remain

On March 13, 2019, two former students killed five students, two school employees, and a relative in Suzano. This dossier distinguishes eight murder victims from the often reported total of ten deaths, follows the investigation, support for families, and rebuilding of Raul Brasil State School, and examines the limits of proposed explanations.

Suzano, São Paulo, Brasil · See stories from this place and nearby

Eight victims: why many headlines said ten

On March 13, 2019, eight people were murdered in Suzano, greater São Paulo: five students, two employees of Professor Raul Brasil State School, and Jorge Antônio de Moraes, killed before the assault on the school. The two perpetrators also died inside the building. Thus, “ten dead” counts every death; it does not mean ten people were murdered by the attackers. That distinction keeps the perpetrators out of a memorial list of victims. It also keeps Jorge, who was killed away from the school, from disappearing in an account often told only from the school gate.

The names behind a disrupted school day

The students were Douglas Murilo Celestino, Caio Oliveira, Samuel Melquíades Silva de Oliveira, Kaio Lucas da Costa Limeira, and Cleiton Antônio Ribeiro. School employees Marilena Ferreira Vieira Umezu and Eliana Regina de Oliveira Xavier were also killed. Jorge, a businessman and an uncle of one perpetrator, was the eighth victim. Samuel drew and illustrated a book; Caio saved money to feed stray dogs; Eliana was studying education, while Marilena had graduated in philosophy. These details, gathered by reporters in 2019, are glimpses of their lives, not complete definitions of who they were. The school was part of daily life for children, workers, and families. Out of respect for those who continued to study there, the atlas shows an approximate location in Suzano, rather than the school's entrance.

From Jorge's death to the attack on Raul Brasil

The two perpetrators, Guilherme Taucci Monteiro, 17, and Luiz Henrique de Castro, 25, had previously attended the school. Before going to Raul Brasil, they attacked Jorge at his workplace. They then entered the school during a morning of classes and attacked students and staff. Witness accounts and investigative records establish this essential sequence, though early reports differed on some details. This dossier does not reproduce their route through the building, footage of the killings, or tactical features of the attack. The necessary chronology is the move from a first killing outside the school to violence against an entire school community.

The end of the attack and changing casualty figures

Both perpetrators died inside the school. Survivors received hospital treatment; others escaped physical injury but still had to live with what they saw. Initial reports gave different numbers of injured people, and later municipal accounts used different measures for people treated, hospitalized, and wounded. This dossier therefore avoids a single injury count without a dated source and definition. Suzano's mourning decree recorded ten deaths in all, including the perpetrators; São Paulo's Justice Secretariat identified the eight people they killed.

Support began on the same day

Suzano declared three days of mourning and set up a center for families seeking news. By late afternoon on March 13, about 200 people had passed through it, according to the city government. São Paulo's Justice Secretariat sent a victim-support team and announced emergency assistance through CRAVI, its victim assistance and reference center. In the following weeks, the municipality expanded psychological support to psychosocial care centers and health clinics. These actions document an institutional response; they do not prove that every survivor's or relative's needs were fully met.

The material trail: gun and ammunition

Investigators examined how the perpetrators obtained a gun and ammunition. After reviewing the police inquiry, Folha described weaknesses in tracing and control and reported scrutiny of people suspected of selling or brokering the gun. Being investigated, arrested, and convicted are different legal states: without a verified judgment, this dossier does not claim a final conviction for suppliers mentioned in news reports. Following the material trail matters because it asks how access to lethal means was possible, beyond speculation about the perpetrators' personalities, without providing operational detail that could be copied.

A third young person in the proceedings

Police investigated an adolescent who was not present during the attack. In May 2019, a juvenile court found the allegation that he had assisted in planning to be substantiated and ordered a custodial socio-educational measure, according to Agência Estado. The defense disputed the assertion of knowing participation. Because the case involved a minor and was handled under confidentiality rules, this dossier does not identify him or call him a perpetrator of the school killings. The ruling about planning matters, but it cannot establish acts he did not commit.

Disputed motives and the search for notoriety

Early interviews included family claims of possible bullying; investigators discussed resentment, a wish for recognition, and references to earlier attacks. Online messages and interactions were examined. None of this reduces the crime to one cause such as video games, isolation, mental illness, or bullying alone. A later Brazilian Education Ministry report on attacks at schools treats the phenomenon as multicausal and examines extremist networks and the circulation of violent propaganda. It is a policy analysis, not an individual diagnosis of the two Suzano perpetrators.

Returning to class did not mean returning to before

Raul Brasil resumed activities after an initial suspension. For some students, crossing the same spaces was a desired step; for others, proximity to the violence made returning difficult. Marilena's son was at the school entrance to welcome students when it reopened. His gesture offers an image of the community that footage of the intrusion cannot convey. The municipality reported demand for psychological care, including from people with no physical injuries. Lasting harm included grief, fear, and disrupted education.

Rebuilding the school, then a pandemic delay

In March 2020, Suzano officials inspected renovations that included new rooms and changes to access. Rain affected the delivery schedule; then the covid-19 pandemic suspended in-person classes. Folha reported that construction was complete in April 2020, but the return to the refurbished school was postponed. This complicates a simple recovery story: a community was trying to reclaim its space just as another crisis closed schools across the state. Building work marks one stage; emotional recovery does not follow a construction timetable.

Remembering without replaying the killings

Families, students, and residents left flowers and messages at the school. Other municipal schools held tributes. A later video report can help explain what changed, provided it does not turn attack footage into spectacle or make the perpetrators its main characters. Profiles of the eight people killed and survivors' accounts deserve priority. Whenever the figure ten is used, the people counted must be identified. The school continued to operate, retaining a history both before and after the massacre.

What is established and what remains limited

Established: the two former students killed Jorge, five students, and two employees on March 13, 2019, and died at the school. Documented at particular points in time: inquiry into the gun's origin, a juvenile-court decision concerning planning, municipal assistance, and renovations. Limits: injury totals differ across sources; reported motives and psychological profiles cannot independently establish causation; any judgment concerning suppliers must be checked in its own case record. The useful question now is how to remember eight lives, care for survivors, and reduce risk without amplifying the perpetrators' violent publicity.

Open in Google Maps · Approximate location