Classification: Unverified account

The Varginha ET case: witnesses, an inquiry, and a city that kept the mystery

Three young women reported a disturbing encounter in 1996. Rumours of captures, hospitals, and soldiers followed, along with a 357-page military inquiry and a cultural identity built around the case. What does each record actually establish?

Varginha, Minas Gerais, Brasil · See stories from this place and nearby

The reported encounter in Varginha

On the afternoon of 20 January 1996, sisters Liliane and Valquíria Silva and their friend Kátia Andrade Xavier crossed a vacant lot in Jardim Andere, Varginha, in southern Minas Gerais. They said they saw a crouching figure near a wall, with brown skin and red eyes. Frightened, they ran away. A Folha report published that same year recorded that Liliane initially told her mother she had seen ‘the devil’. That first description matters: the ‘ET’ label came later, as a brief, hard-to-interpret encounter entered the world of researchers, television, and news.

The three witnesses are the starting point, not proof of what the figure was. A Fantástico report broadcast on 4 February 1996 preserved their accounts and the city's response only weeks after the event. Later retellings differ in emphasis, but the core remains: they said they saw something unusual, they were frightened, and they never accepted that they had simply invented the experience. Their testimony does not, however, identify the creature biologically. A sincere description of something seen for a few moments can still leave its nature unknown.

How the capture claim arose

Then the case grew beyond one sighting. UFO researchers proposed that firefighters had captured a creature that morning and that soldiers took it to the Army Sergeants School in Três Corações. Other accounts ran through hospitals in Varginha and ended in Campinas, where the body was supposedly examined. A May 1996 IstoÉ report preserved by Brazil's National Archives shows these claims while they were still new. It records investigators saying they had heard witnesses and reconstructed routes; it does not turn a capture, transport, or autopsy into verified events. The chain of stories grew faster than the physical documentation made public.

The death of Marco Eli Chereze

The death of military police officer Marco Eli Chereze made that chain more sensitive. He died of an infection weeks after the events, and the timing became part of the story that he had touched the supposed being. His death is real; a causal link to an extraterrestrial creature is not established by the records cited here. Treating a person's and family's suffering as decisive evidence without medical proof of that link distorts the history. In 2026, Varginha's municipal government reported a public discussion in which a pathologist connected with the officer's examinations again described a bacterial infection. That adds context to the medical episode; it does not verify the capture described by UFO researchers.

From accounts to a book and an inquiry

The 1996 book Incidente em Varginha, by Vitório Pacaccini and Maxs Portes, set out allegations against soldiers. Those allegations prompted the Army Sergeants School to open Military Police Inquiry 18/1997, later archived by the Superior Military Court as Closed Case 908/1997. The court's catalogue describes two volumes and 357 leaves produced between February and June 1997. This changes what an ‘official investigation of the ET’ means: its purpose was to examine conduct attributed to members of the Army, not to conduct a scientific study of life beyond Earth.

What the case file examined

The inquiry heard people linked to the allegations and compared the alleged transport with vehicle movement records. It found no evidence of a military operation to capture or move a creature. Investigators also suggested that the women might have mistaken a local resident crouching beside the wall for a strange being amid heavy rain and fear. That was the inquiry's proposed explanation, not an identification established by scientific testing. The witnesses rejected it in later accounts and said they knew the resident in question. Both sides of this disagreement matter: closure of the inquiry does not prove that nothing unusual was perceived, while the witnesses' rejection does not prove an extraterrestrial origin.

There is also a difference between the existence of official papers and the strength of evidence for each claim. The court archive establishes that an inquiry took place and lets readers examine what soldiers and others told its investigators. The National Archives preserves press clippings and other records of the reaction. A newspaper clipping in an official archive remains a report about a claim, not an image, specimen, or medical examination of a creature. Conversely, the women's statements are direct testimony of their experience, but they do not document the alleged journey through firefighters, barracks, hospitals, and laboratories. Confusing these levels lets a long narrative seem more proven than its individual pieces allow.

Witnesses and later accounts

The case has continued to acquire new voices. Thirty years on, reports record witnesses who stand by their accounts, researchers who dispute the inquiry, and a doctor who said he saw a being in a hospital whose appearance differed from the figure the women described. These are attributed claims by identifiable people and deserve examination. Yet the sources reviewed provide no medical record, biological specimen, or documentary chain confirming a nonhuman creature. Time can bring new interviews; it also makes personal memory harder to disentangle from old news and versions absorbed over decades.

The mark left on the city

While the figure's origin remains unproven, its effect on Varginha is verifiable. The municipality has built sculptures, a water tower shaped like a spacecraft, and an ET Memorial. In 2023 its heritage council approved the registration of ‘The ET Case and Varginha's Identity’ as intangible cultural heritage, formalised on 5 June. What was recognised was collective memory and its expression in the city, not the existence of an extraterrestrial species. The municipal map and heritage dossier trace that other story: how a reported encounter became architecture, tourism, crafts, and heritage.

The limit of the evidence

Varginha's mystery endures because its layers do not collapse into a single answer. It is documented that three young women reported an encounter, others advanced capture stories, the Army investigated accusations against soldiers, and the city made the case part of its identity. Public evidence remains insufficient to establish an extraterrestrial origin, capture, transport, or autopsy. Reading the inquiry beside the 1996 press and listening to the witnesses again is more revealing than adopting a ready-made explanation: it shows where each piece of evidence ends and interpretation begins.

Open in Google Maps