Classification: Documented

Rodney Alcala: The Dating Game killer and the seven lives behind the headline

In 1978 Rodney Alcala won an episode of The Dating Game despite an earlier violent criminal record. Years of appeals, reexamined evidence and investigations across states ultimately produced convictions for seven murders. The television appearance opens the story; the victims and the limits of the evidence are its center.

Los Angeles, Califórnia, Estados Unidos · See stories from this place and nearby

A win in front of the cameras

In 1978, photographer Rodney Alcala appeared as Bachelor Number One on The Dating Game. Contestant Cheryl Bradshaw chose him after questioning three men she could not see. According to ABC News interviews with former production staff, she telephoned the next day to cancel the date because she felt uncomfortable with him. This is staff members’ later recollection, not proof that he would have harmed her.

The scene became the case’s best-known shorthand. Its real significance lies in the gap between a charming television persona and a criminal history unknown to the show. The map places this dossier approximately in Los Angeles, the center of the television story and California investigation, rather than pretending the murders occurred at one spot.

Before the show: a record the producers did not know

Alcala had already been convicted of a sexual offense against a child before his television appearance. The California Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion records the earlier conviction for lewd conduct involving a child under 14. ABC’s interviews say The Dating Game staff were unaware of his criminal record when they selected him. That describes a gap in the casting process; it does not imply that the staff knew of or condoned his crimes.

The show acquired its sinister meaning only later. Appearing on television was not the evidence that convicted Alcala of murder. It illustrates how someone who had already encountered the criminal justice system could move through public life while other cases remained unsolved.

The people hidden by the nickname

In 2010, an Orange County jury convicted Alcala of five first-degree murders: Jill Barcomb, 18; Georgia Wixted, 27; Charlotte Lamb, 32; Jill Parenteau, 21; and Robin Samsoe, 12. The first four were killed from 1977 to 1979 in the Los Angeles area. Robin disappeared in Huntington Beach in June 1979. California’s corrections department identifies the five victims and the broad chronology.

A 2005 charging notice gives a sense of the distance behind “four Los Angeles women”: Jill Barcomb was found in the Hollywood Hills, Georgia Wixted in her Malibu apartment and Charlotte Lamb in El Segundo. Connecting these cases required preserving evidence and coordinating across jurisdictions. Their lives began long before, and extend in memory far beyond, the killer’s television appearance.

Robin, ballet class and a pair of earrings

On 20 June 1979, Robin left a friend’s apartment for ballet class. The 1984 judicial opinion records that she had practiced ballet and gymnastics since age four and planned to help at the studio to pay for lessons. She never arrived. Her remains were discovered in July in mountains above Sierra Madre. A friend and another witness identified Alcala as the man who photographed the two girls at the beach before she disappeared.

A search led investigators to a Seattle storage locker holding photographs and earrings resembling a pair associated with Robin’s mother. The opinion explicitly says a test of a mark on the earrings was inconclusive. The item mattered to the trial, but should not be retold as a perfect laboratory identification. Witnesses and objects together formed the case; they did not resolve every minute of Robin’s final journey.

Three trials for one murder

Alcala was first convicted in Robin’s murder in 1980. California’s Supreme Court reversed the judgment in 1984 because prejudicial evidence of prior offenses had been admitted. He was convicted again in 1986, but a federal appeals court overturned that second judgment in 2003, prompting a third trial. A procedural reversal is neither an acquittal nor proof that the murder never happened. It means the trial had to comply with rules of evidence and legal safeguards.

As Robin’s case returned to court, evidence in other murders was reexamined. Orange County prosecutors joined her case with four Los Angeles cases; in 2010, the combined prosecution produced five murder convictions. The path shows how old evidence can take on new meaning through later methods, and how years of litigation can separate an event from a valid final judgment.

The Seattle locker and unidentified photographs

Alcala’s Seattle storage locker became one of the investigation’s most troubling elements. Police recovered hundreds of photographs. In 2010, Orange County prosecutors and Huntington Beach police sought help identifying dozens of women and children in more than 100 images. Their statement was explicit: it was unclear whether any of those photographed had been victimized by Alcala.

A picture may establish that a person stood before a camera; it cannot alone establish assault, disappearance or murder. Investigators weighed the people’s privacy against the value of seeking leads. This dossier links the official appeal without republishing pictures of people whose identities and circumstances were uncertain, or turning their faces into a speculative victim list.

New York: two guilty pleas

Deaths in another state remained unresolved. The Manhattan district attorney’s annual report records that on 14 December 2012, Alcala pleaded guilty to murdering Cornelia Crilley in 1971 and Ellen Hover in 1977. Both were 23. On 7 January 2013, New York sentenced him to 25 years to life. Added to the five California convictions, these are seven murders established through convictions or guilty pleas.

Manhattan’s cold-case unit revisited evidence and interviewed more than one hundred witnesses, according to its report. That work joined cases separated by decades; it does not make every disappearance between them attributable to Alcala. Cornelia’s death in 1971 also predates the television episode by several years.

Wyoming: a charge is not a conviction

In 2016, Wyoming prosecutors charged Alcala with the murder of Christine Ruth Thornton, who disappeared in 1978. Her remains had been found in 1982; she was six months pregnant, according to California’s corrections department. ABC reported that failing health prevented Alcala’s transfer to Wyoming for trial. He died without a final judicial determination in that case.

Christine must therefore not be counted among the seven people for whose murders he was convicted. The charge is a real part of the official record; his criminal responsibility for that death was not adjudicated to a conviction. Other suspicions in other places do not justify presenting estimates of dozens or hundreds of victims as established fact.

What the game-show interviews actually establish

In ABC interviews, producer Mike Metzger recalled feeling uneasy about Alcala during casting, while coordinator Ellen Metzger described Cheryl’s call canceling the date. Fellow contestant Jed Mills also remembered his behavior. These are retrospective accounts of backstage reactions and cultural context, distinct from court documents and forensic evidence.

ABC’s video report lets readers examine how the appearance was later narrated. It is not a complete original episode, and it cannot establish that the television appearance exposed crimes unknown at the time. Ordinary impressions acquired a different meaning after the convictions. The years between event and recollection matter.

What the record leaves us

Alcala died of natural causes on 24 July 2021, aged 77, according to California’s corrections department. The secure judicial record comprises five California murder convictions and two New York guilty pleas. Christine Thornton’s death led to a charge without a completed trial. Many people in the photographs remain unidentified or have uncertain histories in the sources consulted.

The Dating Game explains the nickname, not the whole case. To investigate further, read Robin’s appellate opinion beside the prosecutors’ photo appeal and Manhattan’s report. They answer different questions: what was proven in court, what investigators pursued and what remains unanswered. Keeping those boundaries visible prevents the killer’s notoriety from eclipsing the people affected.

Open in Google Maps · Approximate location